Rich Dad Poor
Dad,
What the Rich Teach
Their Kids About Money
That the Poor
and Middle Class Do Not!
by
Robert T. Kiyosaki with Sharon L. Lechter
CPA
Warner
Books Edition
Copyright
(c) 1997, 1998 by Robert T Kiyosaki and Sharon L Lechter
Reading this book was a real paradigm shift for
me. Many ideas I have had to let settle
in my mind and process for a while.
Robert had a best friend that he was inseparable from. The rich dad referred to is this friend's
father. At the time he made the choice of
who he would listen to, his own father had a good steady income and had
accumulated a lot more "stuff."
In past book reports I have lived with the ideas and used them enough
that I might have been able to teach the ideas in my book report. Most of the ideas presented in this book are
too new to me for me to be able to do that.
One idea that is becoming more focused is the idea of what really
constitutes an asset. Most of what I
considered assets in the past are actually
liabilities, and I have been in the process of getting rid of most of those
over the past two years. I have hardly
any "stuff" anymore, but I also have hardly any debt any more
either. The temptation to get more
"stuff" is still there, and I did purchase a Native American style
pine flute yesterday, although I will probably only really play my tin
whistle. I was actually looking for a Hohner Chromonica and all the
music stores only sell CD's and no longer sell instruments or sheet music. Well?
I *deserved* something didn't I?
(Isn't this disease insidious?)
My reasoning was I could play it after ten at night because the low soft
tones wouldn't pierce the walls of my apartment like the whistle does. I should be in bed anyway.
Would I suggest you buy this book? Perhaps not if you can read
a book and remember what you have read.
Barnes and Noble sells a lot of used books for the new price. I have used a lot of books there myself. But I had to bring this one home to attack it
with a yellow marker. There is a great
deal of information
in the two hundred pages in this book and the sixteen dollars was wisely
invested.
Some questions to ask yourself and where to find the
answers:
Are you a donkey working to get a carrot on a stick
you never get? The answer is in Lesson
One: The Rich Don't Work for Money. An
oft repeated idea from that chapter is "A job is only a short term
solution to a long term problem."
What are my assets?
How can I tell if something I have is an asset? Lesson Two: Why Teach Financial
Literacy? "Rich people acquire
assets. The poor and middle class
acquire liabilities which they think are assets."
Most of chapter one contrasts the thinking of the rich
dad and the poor dad. These contrasts
are also in other parts of the book and where the following do not come from
chapter one, I will give the page numbers.
QUOTES:
Both men were strong, charismatic and
influential. Both men offered me advice,
but they did not advise the same things.
Both men believed strongly in education but did not recommend the same
course of study.
If I had only one dad, I would have had to accept or
reject his advice. Having two dads
advising me offered me a choice of contrasting points of view; one of a
rich man and one of a poor man.
Instead of simply accepting or rejecting one or the
other, I found myself thinking more, comparing and then choosing for myself.
The problem was, the rich man
was not yet rich and the poor man not yet poor.
Both were just starting out on their careers, and both were struggling
with money and families. But they had
very different points of view about the subject of money.
For example, one dad would say, "The love of
money is the root of all evil." The
other, "The lack of money is the root of all evil."
. . . one dad had a habit of
saying, "I can't afford it."
The other dad forbade those words to be used. He insisted I say, "How can I afford
it?"
One dad recommended, "Study hard so you can find
a good company to work for." The
other recommended, "Study hard so you can find a good company to
buy."
One dad said, "The reason I am not rich is
because I have you kids." The other
said, "The reason I must be rich is because of you kids."
One encourage talking about money and business at the
dinner table. The other forbade the
subject of money to be discussed over a meal.
One said, " When it
comes to money, play it safe, don't take risks." The other said, "Learn to manage
risk."
One believed. "Our home is our largest investment
and our greatest asset." The other
believed, "My house is a liability, and IF YOUR HOUSE IS YOUR LARGEST
INVESTMENT, YOU'RE IN TROUBLE."
I
noticed that people really do shape their life through
their thoughts. For example, my poor dad
always said, "I'll never be rich."
And that prophesy became reality.
My rich dad on the other hand, always referred to himself as rich. He would say things like, "I am a rich
man, and rich people don't do this (should have used this one as I was taking
the pine flute to the register)."
Even when he was flat broke after a financial setback,
he continued to refer to himself as a rich man.
He would cover himself by saying, "There is a difference between
being poor and being broke. Broke is
temporary, and poor is eternal."
I notice that my poor dad was poor not because of the
amount of money he earned, which was significant, but because of his thoughts
and actions. As a young boy, having tow
fathers, I became acutely aware of being careful which thoughts I chose to
adopt as my own.(Shouldn't we as mature adults be just
as concerned with that choice?)
page 142 (from Lesson Six: Work
to Learn -- Don't Work for Money)
Both of my dads were generous men. Both made it a practice to give first. Teaching was one of their ways of
giving. The more they gave, the more
they received. One glaring difference
was in the giving of money. My rich dad
gave lots of money away. He gave to his
church, to charities, to his foundations.
He knew that to receive money, you had to give money. Giving money is the secret to most great
wealthy families. . . . My educated dad always said, "When I
have some extra money, I'll give it."
The problem was there was never any extra. So he worked harder to draw more money in
rather than focus on the most important law of money: "Give and you shall
receive." Instead, he believed in
"Receive and then you give."